Positively Healthy Flag  
HELLO BOYZ! WHO RUNS THE PINK PAPER?
     
Home
The History
Alchemy
Registered Enabled
The ELECTHIV Project
Gay Men's 360° Health
The Park Project
Our Funders
Dedication
 
 
The following articles were published on Pink Paper's successful attempt to 'gag' Chris Morris and Outcast.
 

Freedom fear on website closure

Stop Press

 
 
 
By Chris Morris Issue 8 - May 2000
 

Chris MorrisSeldom have two men achieved so much without really being noticed. Like our next door neighbours, we may know their names and have a vague idea of what they look like, but what else do we actually know about the two men who publish Pink Paper and Boyz - the magazines that set the queer agenda and act as a focus for mainstream gay life?

David Bridle and Kelvin Sollis are private people; that is perhaps their most endearing feature. Unlike many 'queens' who have hit the big time, the backroom boyz haven't opted for the limelight. They haven't chosen a life of excessive luxury either, apparently preferring intimate dinner parties to glittering public functions or nightclubs. As one of their close circle of friends says: 'socially, they are very good company and fun to be with, but they both have a slightly paranoid streak and hate being around anyone who might challenge them. They'd rather stay at home than go to places where they might be confronted by readers or anyone who disagrees with them.'

Their longing for privacy seems to extend further than that though, leading them to hide away at other times when it might have been better for them to have been more open. Kelvin Sollis didn't attend court in 1998 when his former typesetters, Goodfellow and Egan, chased one of his magazines for a bad debt after it abruptly terminated its contract after eighteen months. A judgement was made in his absence and one of his companies, Boyz Own Productions, was liquidated in the High Court last year as a result. He refuses to talk about it.

Several of his and Bridle's other companies, including those that have published the Pink Paper and Boyz, have only very recently filed their Companies House records. Now that up-to-date information is available, it is clear that the company that publishes the magazines is not the same as the company that produces them. Bridle and Sollis refuse to comment on that either.

Although they originally agreed to answer any questions that Outcast cared to put to them in writing, that offer was withdrawn when the questions arrived. Instead, I received a rather terse letter from the Head of Contentious Media at Mishcon de Reya solicitors. Contentious media? Don't make me blush.

Outcast will, of course, allow Bridle and Sollis - or the Head of Contentious Media - the opportunity to respond to this article in the next issue.

EmpireCover of Outcast Magazine

As well as owning the Pink Paper, Boyz, Fluid and Homosex, Britain's most successful gay media owners have also forged links with a host of other businesses and good causes, including London Mardi Gras - the new 'Gay Pride', the SoNow Internet portals and Body Positive. They even run their own HIV charity, 'Positive Lives', which was set up five years ago to establish hostels and a network of helplines for HIV positive people. (It doesn't appear to have begun work on those projects yet, and Bridle and Sollis did not answer our questions about the charity's finances.)

The paper trail goes back to the mid-1980s when Kelvin Sollis owned a majority share of Mindmaster Limited, one of the many limited companies that has been used to publish the popular weekly newspaper Pink Paper.
The Pink Paper's founders Stephen Burton and Stephen Burn claim that Sollis bullied them into resigning from Mindmaster. They claim he tried to hold the 'paper to ransom by changing the conditions of a loan. Sollis refuses to comment.
Recently, the Pink has been published by Chronos Publishing Services Limited, a company jointly owned by Bridle and Sollis. Before that it was published by Chronos Publishing Limited, a similarly-named company owned by the same two men. It's said to be a running joke in the magazine's North London offices - which company will be put on the masthead this week?

The regular switching from one publisher to another will come as a surprise to many readers, and may even be news to some of those who deal with the companies on a regular basis. Both companies use the same logo and have the same design on their letterheads - only the word 'Services' is inserted at the foot.


One thing that both Chronos companies have in common is the apparently relaxed attitude they have to filing documents with Companies House. Until my letter arrived with Bridle and Sollis at the end of February, no annual accounts had been filed for Chronos Publishing since 1997, and Chronos Publishing Services had not even filed its first annual return.

Fortunately, things were quickly corrected. Chronos Publishing's accounts for the year ending 1998 were filed last month, as were the following year's. Both show an annual income of around £50,000 and a profit of less than £4,000. Not very impressive for a company that has been publishing two of Britain's leading gay weeklies.

It must be assumed from that, that the advertising revenue - which, for Pink Paper, Boyz, Fluid and Homosex combined, is estimated to be over £8m per year - has gone through a different company. It can't be Chronos Publishing Services because that company wasn't incorporated until November 1998. Nor can it be Windwood Limited, which filed 'small accounts' last Summer and shows an income of well below £8m. So which company is it? Bridle and Sollis refuse to say.
When a journalist from Punch asked about this last month, Sollis said he was only in the office a few days a month and was unsure how the companies were structured. He said he would fax Punch a full explanation. He didn't.


Other oversights with regard to Companies House include Kelvin Sollis signing Chronos Publishing's annual return last October, two months after he officially resigned as a director. According to the Companies House register, Chronos Publishing was without any directors from October 1999 until February 2000. Under the Companies Act, all companies (even dormant ones) must have at least one director.


Charity

In the Summer of 1996, egged on by wealthy friends in the charity industry, Bridle and Sollis set up Positive Lives, their own HIV charity. They said it would transform the lives of HIV-positive people, but instead it has been surprisingly quiet - apparently only used to publish one of their commercially-successful magazines, Positive Times, which has now ceased trading.

The original trust deed for Positive Lives sets out plans to establish several hostels for young people around Britain; launch a central organisation to promote the use of those hospices; create a network of helplines that would give free advice and information; and set up an archive of lesbian and gay history. There has been no news about these exciting projects, and Bridle and Sollis refused to respond to our questions about them.

The only objective that Positive Lives does seem to have pursued is the publication of Positive Times, a free magazine that was launched as a commercial concern in 1995, and then taken over by the charity in 1996. It ceased publishing last year. The magazine, which made a profit during its first year, received a substantial income from the drug companies and health groups that regularly advertised in it. In publishing the magazine through a charity, Bridle and Sollis, together with their fellow trustees - William Curry, Simon Brycesson and Glyn Maddocks - took on a number of new benefits and responsibilities.

Accountability

Like Chronos' relationship with Companies House, Positive Lives appears to have a relaxed approach to filing documents with the Charities Commission. A veteran CHE activist has lodged a complaint with the Charities Commission as a result. The original trust document for Positive Lives confirms that at least £1,000 was donated to the charity when it was set up in 1996. At the Mike Rhodes Trust awards later the same year, activists were told that a further £20,000 had been donated. We estimate that the advertising revenue from Positive Times over the three-year period from 1996-1999 was approximately £600,000, and that subscriptions would have generated a further £5,000. We cannot know what donations, covenants or other gifts the charity may have received.

Just as with the commercial titles, there seems to be confusion over whether the charity that published Positive Times was also responsible for running the magazine and whether it received the revenue generated through advertising. It is possible that, although the magazine was published by the charity from December 1996, some of the advertising revenue was being received elsewhere. Outcast has seen invoices relating to one community group's advertising contract with Positive Times and the Pink Paper during the period that Positive Times was being published by the charity. Windwood Limited - a commercial company - issued the invoices for both titles and both show the same VAT registration details and internal account number. When asked about this, Bridle and Sollis refused to comment.


Pink power

Some may ask what the relevance of all this is to your average punter who just wants to flick through his weekly copy of Boyz while sipping vodka in his local gay bar. Isn't all this just media politics, one could ask, of the kind that makes Punch fascinating to those in the loop, but largely irrelevant to the population as a whole?

I think that the way that Bridle and Sollis have used their power is relevant because I think it has had a huge impact on the gay community. One former editor, Nigel Edwards, noticed a definite shift towards 'consumerism' in the Pink Paper's editorial policy around the Summer of 1996 - the same time that gay activists claim the queer community became increasingly 'apathetic' and 'difficult to stir'. It's difficult to conclude that one had no bearing on the other. Of course, there is no reason that Bridle and Sollis should have to use their magazines for the benefit of the community.

Edwards also told Outcast that his former employers told him to cover news stories in ways that he was uncomfortable with, in order to keep advertisers happy. 'I was keen to ensure that the Pink Paper kept a balanced approach to what was going on over AIDS and AZT', he says. 'We weren't scientists ourselves and I didn't think that we should accept verbatim the releases put out by the drugs companies. 'But after some initial balancing articles, Bridle told me flat that drugs companies were big and important advertisers, and they were not to be upset. So any "dissident" stuff got cut out.'

Andrew Saxton, another former editor of the Pink Paper, told the New Statesman last year that there were many times that he felt under pressure to compromise his integrity to please Bridle. 'There is a fine line between censorship and honest journalism', he said. 'As an editor, I had to fight extremely hard to keep us on the right side of that line.' Other former journalists claim that Bridle and Sollis have a 'black list' of people who are not to be mentioned or given any publicity in their magazines. One former reporter says that Peter Tatchell was once airbrushed out of a picture because the senior managers 'disapproved' of his protest at Canterbury Cathedral. 'This wasn't an editorial decision', he said. 'It was simply because they didn't like Tatchell and didn't want him in their magazine.'


Nigel Edwards also claims to have witnessed Stonewall's Angela Mason being cropped out of a photo after she upset Sollis. He says: 'I found the Pink Paper was being used as a weapon in petty score settling. There was a black list of people or organisations in the gay community we were not allowed to mention.'

Influence

It could all have been so different. Like Oscar Schindler, who began his business life by profiting from a marginalised community living in a ghetto, Bridle and Sollis could have used their wealth and influence to leave a mark on society and change the world for the better. Their magazines could have provided a rallying point for activists and a vehicle for challenging society's attitude towards lesbians and gay men. Instead the two men serve as a simple reminder that, just because someone is gay, it doesn't necessarily mean they are on the side of gay liberation in its purest sense. Rather than challenging oppression and the ghetto-mentality, Bridle and Sollis have profited, in all senses of the word, from it. Their comfortable lives come at a cost.

 

Positively Healthy 1 Princes Street Richmond Surrey TW9 1ED United Kingdom
Tel / Fax: 020 8977 4411 email: info@posh-uk.org.uk
Est. 1986 Registered Charity No. 801544